| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
321. New T3 Hulls soon - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Originally by: Akita T Lose T3 frig - no SP loss Lose T3 cruiser - one level lost Lose T3 battlecruiser - two levels lost Lose T2 battleship - three levels lost If you're flying a t2 bs in a situation where it can be lost, then you p...
- by Tasko Pal - at 2011.03.28 03:11:00
|
322. The most detailed Dominion market analysis so far ( BIG ! ) - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Herman Klaus I really think buying now isn't that high a risk. It's been pushed down by the scaremongers and once everyone realises that all the speculation is unfounded they'll start buying back up again. There's a ve...
- by Tasko Pal - at 2011.03.25 14:15:00
|
323. The most detailed Dominion market analysis so far ( BIG ! ) - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Satyri Hermides Tech going down faster than the head cheerleader of TCU after the Rose Bowl! No seriously, no manipulation this time I swear, it has dropped 10% in a day. So what? It's 10% down from an all time high. Th...
- by Tasko Pal - at 2011.03.24 21:27:00
|
324. Bad deal on Khanid LP - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
Some of the corps are really pathetic too. Khanid Innovation is the weakest R&D corp out there with only two level 2 agents. Khanid works has a 4/-17 mining agent in high sec. That's it aside from some level 1 and level 2 agents.
- by Tasko Pal - at 2011.03.24 13:48:00
|
325. Where to do L4 to avoid suicide gankers - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
Mission in low sec or 0.0. It's impossible to suicide gank you there.
- by Tasko Pal - at 2011.03.24 03:05:00
|
326. Following Candidates support removing T2 BPOs - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: SellOrder Forum Limited edition being the most important part, would you agree then that T2 BPO's are now much more "Limited Edition" than they ever have been and will only get more limited edition as time goes by. Fraud c...
- by Tasko Pal - at 2011.03.15 20:06:00
|
327. Following Candidates support removing T2 BPOs - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Amdor Renevat Unique items that were available to people who play a game longer are nice as long as they don't give some kind of advantage. So in Eve's case the rewards should be ships that are the same power as others of ...
- by Tasko Pal - at 2011.03.15 02:08:00
|
328. Following Candidates support removing T2 BPOs - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: SellOrder Forum You Paid ôRandomEvePlayer" 50 Billion for a T2 Print. If I destroy that print, where is your 50 Billion. IÆm pretty sure its still in RandomEvePlayer's wallet is it not? Also reread the EULA you will be fa...
- by Tasko Pal - at 2011.03.15 02:03:00
|
329. Following Candidates support removing T2 BPOs - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Tutskii "Unique legacy of a bad design by CCP that got removed" The bad design wasn't "removed". The lottery was allowed to play out to most of the T2 market. It's worth noting that the T2 BPOs were fairly allotted and...
- by Tasko Pal - at 2011.03.14 03:36:00
|
330. Following Candidates support removing T2 BPOs - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Caldariftw123 I don't see anyone saying shaft speculators, they're just saying speculation is not a reason for CCP to keep the status quo .. speculation, by it's very nature, brings risk and one of those risks is CCP nerfi...
- by Tasko Pal - at 2011.03.13 22:23:00
|
331. Following Candidates support removing T2 BPOs - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Shadow Lord77 Edited by: Shadow Lord77 on 13/03/2011 04:02:48 Tech II BPO's do two things in my opinion. 1. They crowd out Markets that would otherwise yield a higher profit for regular inventors. 2. They require less ...
- by Tasko Pal - at 2011.03.13 22:20:00
|
332. Following Candidates support removing T2 BPOs - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Edited by: Tasko Pal on 13/03/2011 16:54:42 Originally by: Tutskii Originally by: Tasko Pal So what? You may have grounds for disagreeing on whether they are rational, but you don't have grounds for disagreeing that they are r...
- by Tasko Pal - at 2011.03.13 16:53:00
|
333. Looking for a specific agent website - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
I went googling and found Eve Commander-Agents which seems to have the functionality you wanted.
- by Tasko Pal - at 2011.03.13 02:49:00
|
334. Abandoned POS in W-space - in Missions & Complexes [original thread]
I should have said, if the pos were offline (which is the same condition as the forcefield being down). An offline pos can still have corp crew in the system.
- by Tasko Pal - at 2011.03.12 20:38:00
|
335. Following Candidates support removing T2 BPOs - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Estel Arador Because it's an old game mechanic for which the replacement has already been deployed. That excuse hasn't been good enough to discard a lot of old Eve content. There are a zillion ways to find and shoot pl...
- by Tasko Pal - at 2011.03.12 20:32:00
|
336. Following Candidates support removing T2 BPOs - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Estel Arador I'll quote the recent dev blog, which used the phrase in a different context, but it still applies here: "**** happens". So the argument here is that CCP should remove T2 BPOs because CCP can? You might no...
- by Tasko Pal - at 2011.03.12 19:15:00
|
337. Following Candidates support removing T2 BPOs - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Kethas Protagonist Such a conclusion would be fallacious because it makes the incorrect assumption that, in the absence of rigorous evidence either way, T2 BPOs should be kept. You're imposing a burden of proof upon T2 BPO...
- by Tasko Pal - at 2011.03.12 19:07:00
|
338. To people that want to remove T2 BPOs : give a GOOD reason why - in Science and Industry [original thread]
Edited by: Tasko Pal on 12/03/2011 17:09:02 Quote: B) DETERMINE A FAIR SYSTEM FOR THEIR REMOVAL While I still come down solidly against removing T2 BPOs, I can think of a relatively fair system for replacing them. You can replace t...
- by Tasko Pal - at 2011.03.12 17:08:00
|
339. Following Candidates support removing T2 BPOs - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: Tutskii With no more supply, of course its price goes through the roof. Is that an argument for not removing the unique items in the future? Yes, that is an argument for keeping the unique items. In general, it is re...
- by Tasko Pal - at 2011.03.12 16:54:00
|
340. Following Candidates support removing T2 BPOs - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Originally by: RAW23 Please don't jump to conclusions about what I want. I didn't. You posted and I replied, based on your post. Your more recent post merely confirms my original impression. Quote: Whether or not it was an 'ob...
- by Tasko Pal - at 2011.03.12 16:14:00
|
| Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 |
| First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |